After the COVID-19 pandemic halted many asylum procedures around Europe, fresh technologies have become reviving these systems. Out of lie recognition tools examined at the edge to a system for validating documents and transcribes selection interviews, a wide range of solutions is being found in asylum applications. This article explores just how these solutions have reshaped the ways asylum procedures will be conducted. That reveals how asylum seekers happen to be transformed into pressured hindered techno-users: They are asked to adhere to a series of techno-bureaucratic steps and keep up with unforeseen tiny within criteria and deadlines. This obstructs their capacity to find their way these devices and to go after their legal right for cover.
It also illustrates how these types of technologies happen to be embedded in refugee governance: They help the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a flutter of spread technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity by hindering all of them from accessing the stations of coverage. It hop over to this website further states that studies of securitization and victimization should be coupled with an insight in the disciplinary mechanisms these technologies, by which migrants are turned into data-generating subjects who all are self-disciplined by their reliability on technology.
Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal knowledge, the article argues that these systems have an natural obstructiveness. There is a double result: although they assist with expedite the asylum process, they also make it difficult with regards to refugees to navigate these types of systems. They may be positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes all of them vulnerable to bogus decisions of non-governmental celebrities, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their situations. Moreover, they pose new risks of’machine mistakes’ which may result in incorrect or discriminatory outcomes.
